The Paris Street Beakers in Catalonia were mostly buried with Maritime and epi-Maritime ceramics, and two of the later Pyrenees Group. Unfortunately, there isn't any specific information on which layer the ten individuals come from or with which ceramics they were associated with. There was also an eleventh individual that did not make it into the study.
In a previous post, I noted that Beakers associated with the old school Maritime-inspired pottery, the best I can so far tell, appear to lack or have a reduced Steppe component. This appears true in at least two other regions outside of Iberia [Hégenheim], and maybe a third.
The Cerdanyola newspaper reports that two of the women were first degree relatives. If I am reading correctly, all of them were lactase persistent except for one woman.
"Individual 5 from Level II" Fig 1 of (Gomez-Merino et al, 2011) |
Looking on a continental scale, the Olalde authors concluded "...we could significantly exclude Iberian sources [for the Beaker complex]...These results support largely different origins for Beaker Complex individuals, with no discernible Iberia-related ancestry outside Iberia."
By "Significantly exclude", we might assume they have excluded from the continental ethnic a component directly attributable to early Iberian Bell Beakers, not just Iberians. When the genomes are public, we might have more confidence or we might have more questions! The unequal resurgence of hunter ancestry in the Middle Neolithic may give us some pause.
Fig. 7 of (Frances et al, 2006) |
The narrative from Olalde et al:
"Paris Street (Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain)
Contact person: Joan Francès Farré
During urban construction work at Paris Street in Cerdanyola del Vallès (Vallès Occidental, Barcelona province) in 2003, a large amount of skeletal material and associated pottery was unearthed. Follow-up excavation uncovered a Chalcolithic hypogeum with more than 9,000 human remains as well as lithic and ceramic material, the latter assigned to the Bell Beaker tradition. The hypogeum displays several occupational phases. The 59 oldest one presented an ash layer underlying the first inhumations that could have a ritualistic significance. Charcoal from that basal layer was dated to 2878-2496 calBCE (4110±60 BP, UBAR-817). The first funerary phase (UE-15) shows a large number of successive inhumations (minimal number of individuals 36) that are still in anatomical position, placed in lateral decubitus and with flexed knees. Seven arrow points were retrieved from this layer. A thin, upper layer (UE-5) probably represents a re-organization of the existing funerary space, prior to the second funerary phase (UE-2). At UE-5, two Bell Beaker vessels of maritime style were retrieved. The UE-2 layer comprises fewer inhumations, and all of them were accompanied by typical Bell Beaker vessels: three in Maritime style, and two in epi-Maritime style. There were also numerous additional pieces of diverse typology. Over this layer, a final one, labelled UE-3, contained two more skeletons arranged over riverbed pebbles with a Bell Beaker vessel of a regional style known as "Pyrenaic". A bone from this layer yielded the youngest date in the hypogeum of 2469-2206 calBCE (3870±45 BP, UBAR-860). We recovered ancient DNA data from 10 individuals:
I0257/10362A: 2571–2350 calBCE [R1b1 + H1ax]
I0258/10367A: 2850–2250 BCE [H1q]
I0260/10370A: 2850–2250 BCE [I2a2a + K1a2a]
I0261/10378A: 2850–2250 BCE [R1b1a(xR1b1a1a2a) +U5b1i]
I0262/10381A: 2850–2250 BCE [U5b3]
I0263/10385A: 2850–2250 BCE [X2b+226]
I0823/10360A: 2850–2250 BCE [H1]
I0825/10394A: 2474–2300 calBCE (3915±29 BP, MAMS-25939) [G2 + K1a4a1] I0826/10400A: 2833–2480 calBCE (4051±28 BP, MAMS-25940) [H1t]
I1553/10388A: 2850–2250 BCE" [pre-H103]
From Fig S1, Olalde et al, 2017 |
The article concerning the testing of DNA.
L’hipogeu calcolític del carrer París de Cerdanyola del Vallès, 2006 [Link]
JOAN FRANCÈS*, MARC GUÀRDIA**, TONA MAJÓ***, ÒSCAR SALA**
Gibaja, J. F., Palomo, A., Francés, J., Majó, T., 2006 – Les puntes de sageta de l’hipogeu calcolític del carrer Paris (Cerdanyola): caracterització tecnomorfològica i funcional. Cypsela, 16: 127-133. [Link]
G. Gómez-Merino, T. Majó, C. Lorenzo, F. Gispert-Guirado, M. Stankova et J. Francés, « Identification of Cinnabar by non-Destructive Techniques on a Human Mandible from Carrer Paris Chalcolithic Hypogeum (Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain) », ArcheoSciences, 35 | 2011, 241-247. [Link]
"Els grups del neolitic final, calcolitic i bronze antic. Els inicis de la metal-lurgia"
Araceli Martin Colliga. Cota Zero n. 18, 2003. Vic, p. 76-105 ISSN 0213-4640 [Link]
I find it a bit frustrating that the authors didn't really comment on these Beakers. 50% R1b (if low resolution) and H with high frequencies of LP? You'd think these would be quite noteworthy. I guess the authors' focus is more on the aDNA.
ReplyDeleteSince the most recent paper concerning the Michelsberg 'upper class' and then several oddities such as the Baalberger from two or three years ago and then recently the Blatterhole folk, I have some questions about what was going on in Western Europe during the MN. Volker Heyd hinted at this in his paper 'Kossinna's Smile'.
DeleteIt's a bit of a fuzzy area for me, but a few more genomes from the MN and the situation could quickly become more complex.
The first paper I would look for is one to be released soon called 'Disentangling Haplogroup H' or something to that effect.
DeleteThis is also quite significant: we're seeing (y)R1b and (mt)H approaching modern frequencies (also lactose tolerance!) with Bell Beakers AND before (Michelsberg). So all this fits reasonably well my notion of complex processes (several cultures implicated) springing from Atlantic Europe, quite possibly with "hybrid" Neolithic cultures (and mixed HG-farmer genetics) but which anyhow saw EEF-like "purer" Neolithic peoples as somewhat foreign in most cases and generally expanding at their expense.
ReplyDelete