At 7:50 Sheridan discusses Ava's high status as indicated by a cow shoulder blade in the grave. But does a cow scapula necessarily point to a food offering, or are there other possibilities? If it was a food offering, could the preference of this cut tell us something about food preparation in the Scottish Early Bronze Age?
By Hew Morrison via Smithsonian Magazine |
Since the animal may have been butchered for the occasion of Ava's death, we should assume that she had a favorable cut, or at least some non-random process determined what ended up in her grave.
I'll offer two and a half alternative purposes for Ava's cow bone selection. The first has quite a bit of historical support, though I can't say to what degree if ever it was used as a grave item. The second is much more speculative, but interesting nonetheless. The third is just a few notes.
1. Scapulimancy. A scapula reader saw a good omen in the bone.
The prominence of European scapulimancy can't be under-appreciated when considering this case. In Scotland, this is called slinneineachd in the old tongue, which is interpreting a boiled, right-hand scapula. (Spence, 1999). Beakers were cattle folk and it would be difficult to see superstitious Beakers inserting an unread scapula into the grave. OTOH, it looks as if Ava's scapula is a left-hand shoulder, so maybe not? Did this bone have meat on it?
Also, does the bone appear to have a few red stains? Is that cinnabar or ochre? If so, how did it get on the bone?
In a scapulmancy scenario, we might imagine that different relatives came in for the wake. Hillbillies walk by and touch her cold hands and they all drink very heavily and process a bullock, quartering it out for the guests. Some bug-eyed person reads the boiled scapula, it's a message of fortune. Maybe Ava shared a number of fears toward her end, like the well-being of her child(ren) or the meaningfulness of her own life. The good answer may have been inserted in the grave for that reason.
See also Scapulimancy in occultopedia,
2. Ava played some sort of harp or lyre.
Again, it's a bit curious that she is buried with a scapula, although it may be a left-hand. A hypothesis by Matahisa Koitabashi, 2013 concerned Near Eastern RH-notched bovine scapulas. Basically, he believes it's the frame is some sort of scraper musical instrument, but not a lute bridge as previously suggested. Without notches, it's hard to see it as a warping paddle, although I've suggested previously that Beaker women were often buried with sewing kits.
The scapular bone is easily scraped from the beef (here at two minutes), and you can see how large the harp-like bone actually is. Maybe it's ironic that a scapula looks like a harp or lyre, or even that the harp is associated with a goddess like Egyptian Hathor or the bovine lyres of Sumeria.
Freeze from "A Journey through Scotland's Part: The Age of Bronze" |
3. And finally, let's get to the beef cuts.
One thing that may not be so obvious is how beef is cut and prepared in the island of Britain historically. In the United States, Bar-b-Que is a tradition originating in Southern England (Narnia) and in which the preference for meat was typically over the fire. For this reason, blackening leaner cuts gives a flavorful taste and so the back cuts, rump and flanks come out pretty good.
The forward of the cow which has lots of marbling (the round) gets turned into ground beef or stew cubes. This is important because in the borderlands and northern areas of Britain making beef stews was the cooking preference, so fatty meats may have been the prime for boiling with vegetables.
Even in the most primitive, hunter-gatherer society, cutting beef or buffalo is a science, so I highly doubt Beakers simply tossed a slab of beef over the shoulder into a grave. That bone is evidence of something: supper, supplication or sound.
I just got around to listening to the podcast with Allison Sheridan. I'll assume that her science is top notch. But her commentary on the topic was terrible. She seems to know, somehow, that the Amesbury Archer came to Britain to visit Stonehenge. How she knows, I have no idea. Later, when discussing the diffusion model - which is now locked up by DNA - she sees the need to be skeptical and demand more proof. So she knows about rigorous skepticism, but just forgets about it when the fancy strikes her. I saw this sort of thing from anthropologists when I was studying evolution and genetics in grad school. Some people can talk the talk of the scientific method, but they really haven't learned to stay engaged in it. Unfounded claims are the marker of someone who just doesn't quite get it. Sorry to be so negative, but the praise she got before the podcast started got my expectations raised beyond what I heard.
ReplyDeleteAn update on Ava
ReplyDeletehttps://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/no-wait-real-ava-bronze-age-woman-scottish-highlands-180970950/
I appreciate it. Covered it here:
Deletehttps://bellbeakerblogger.blogspot.com/2019/01/no-wait-this-is-real-ava-smithsonian.html
An update to Ava's facial likeness.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/no-wait-real-ava-bronze-age-woman-scottish-highlands-180970950/