He lays out the details, which you'll need since the paper is pay-per-view.
Ferdinand and Isabella receive captive Guanches |
These results present a bit of a dilemma for conventional wisdom. Not only are these 61 individuals before the Spanish missions, the Punta Azul individuals are nearly maternally fixed H1-16260. It also appears that haplogroup R1b is native to El Hierro, or at least predates Hispanization. Of course there are also the expected, typical Berber haplogroups. (once again we see a strong relationship between R1b and H1)
No evidence yet suggests habitation before the European Early Bronze Age and the last major immigration event would have been pre-historic Berbers. Between the Berber influx and the Colonial Period, the islands were sometimes visited by maritime powers, but the islands were home to people with relatively little contact between each other or the outside world.
So this leaves several possibilities as to how and when the ancestry of the cave people of El Heirro formed. One is that Punic, Greek or Roman settlers or merchants left a paternal mark on the natives and that this was specifically the introduction of R1b-M269 in the largest part. There could also be unrecorded contact between Medieval Spain and the islands. That's a difficult case to make.
A second possibility is that the presence of R1b among North African Atlas Berbers was at one time much more pronounced than it is now and is reflected in the founding Berber population of the islands. That's a good possibility.
More conservative potteries with geometries and solar motifs [via Gevic] |
A third possibility, and in keeping with the autosomal results and diversity of male lines, is that the islands were already inhabited before the Berber influx and was also genetically monolithic and Atlantic-like, something like if Ireland was invaded by Berbers. It's important to remember the time-frame in which the islands were first populated in a meaningful way (sometime in the 2nd millennium) and also where they are in relation to Western Morocco.
Pintaderas Canarias (Gobierno de Canarias) |
Genetic studies on the prehispanic population buried in Punta Azul cave (El Hierro, Canary Islands)
Highlights
- •
- A total of 61 samples from Punta Azul were analyzed for ancient DNA.
- •
- Success rate: molecular sexing 88.5%, uniparental markers 90.16%, STR 45.9%.
- •
- There is a complete fixation of the H1-16260 mtDNA lineage.
- •
- Y-chromosome results show the presence of three lineages: E-M81, R-M269, and E-M33.
- •
- Matrilineality could explain the behaviors in maternal and paternal lineages.
Abstract
The
aim of this study was to establish the genetic studies of the
population from one of the most important known aboriginal funerary
spaces of the island of El Hierro (Canary Islands), the Punta Azul cave,
which harbors remains of 127 individuals. Sixty-one adult tibiae were
examined, 32 left and 29 right. Radiocarbon dating yields an antiquity
of 1015–1210 AD. We have obtained an overall success rate of 88.5% for
the molecular sexing, and of 90.16% for the uniparental markers. Short
tandem repeats (STR) profiles were also possible for 45.9% of the
samples. This performance is a consequence of the good conservation of
the bones in their archaeological context. The mtDNA composition of the
sample is characterized by the complete fixation of the H1-16260
lineage. These results can be explained by a mixture of consecutive
founding events, a bottleneck episode at the beginning of the
colonization and/or as a consequence of genetic drift. Paternal lineages
were also affected by these processes but in a less acute way. These
differences lead us to propose social behaviors as an explanation for
this difference. The maternal transmission of the lineages, mentioned in
ethnohistorical sources of the Archipelago, could be an explanation.
These results could be in agreement with endogamous practices, but the
autosomal STR results indicate a relative high diversity. These results
have allowed us to characterize the Punta Azul cave population and see
the way in which geographical isolation, the process of adaptation and
specific social behaviors affected the aboriginal population of the
Island.
See also "The Sahara and the Canary Islands: reflections within archaeology, politics and rupestrian manifestations" Farrujia de la Rosa, 2008
"The Guanches of the Canary Islands" Matilda
Did you see this? http://www.timesofisrael.com/eerie-neolithic-masks-to-make-israel-museum-debut/
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this. Was out all weekend so couldn't respond.
Delete